Posts Tagged ‘Announcements’

Loan Mod Scams…Is this the End?

Add a comment  | 

pic via pibillwarner.files

pic via pibillwarner.files

The Governor of California, Arnold Shwartzenegger recently signed legislation to stop scammers from taking the money of troubled Homeowners and consumers who are looking to mitigate the damage the California economy is wreaking on them.

The California Bar Journal posted the names of some of the culprits and the results of their investigation from the task force created last March.  In this article it makes it clear that Safe Haven may be the most prolific violator of citizens rights.

I wouldn’t profess to be an expert in the world of Loan Modifications and forbearance’s however,  I believe my 16 year old son could do a better job!   What is it with these creeps!

A law is something creeps will simply find a way around.  This may not be the absolute end.

Do you know anyone who has been victimized by a scammer?  Together we can reduce their effectiveness.

First Time Buyer Credit has Extras

Add a comment  | 

By signing the new bill, President Barack Obama has approved the first-time homebuyer tax credit extension which will extend the tax credit until April 30, 2010.Extra  img for posts

The extension is part of a $24 billion economic stimulus bill that will extend the $8,000 tax credit for homebuyers who are purchasing their first home from the current November 30 deadline and expands the program to offer a credit of $6,500 to homeowners who have lived in their current home for at least five years and are seeking to relocate.

The following details apply to the homebuyer tax credit expansion ..You may HAVE to pay it back!  Read On.

Who is Eligible

-First-time homebuyers, who are defined by the law as buyers who have not owned a principal residence during the three-year period prior to the purchase, may be eligible for up to an $8,000 tax credit.
-Existing homeowners who have been residing in their principal residence for five consecutive years out of the last eight and are purchasing a home to be their principal residence (“repeat buyer”), may be eligible for up to a $6,500 tax credit.

Income Limits
Homebuyers who file as single or head-of-household taxpayers can claim the full credit ($8,000 for first-time buyers and $6,500 for repeat buyers) if their modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is less than $125,000.

-For married couples filing a joint return, the combined income limit is $225,000.

-Single or head-of-household taxpayers who earn between $125,000 and $145,000, and married couples who earn between $225,000 and $245,000 are eligible to receive a partial credit.

-The credit is not available for single taxpayers whose MAGI is greater than $145,000 and married couples with a MAGI that exceeds $245,000.

Effective Dates
-The eligibility period for the tax credit is for homes purchased after Nov. 6, 2009, and before May 1, 2010. However, home purchases subject to a binding sales contract signed by April 30, 2010, will qualify for the tax credit provided closing occurs prior to July 1, 2010.

Types of Homes that Qualify
-All homes with a purchase price of less than $800,000 qualify, including newly-constructed or resale, and single-family detached, townhomes or condominiums, Short Sale and foreclosures provided that the home will be used as their principal residence. Vacation home and rental property purchases do NOT qualify.

Tax Credit is Refundable
-A refundable credit means that if the amount of income taxes you owe is less than the credit amount you qualify for, the government will send you a check for the difference.

-For example:
-A first-time buyer who qualifies for the full $8,000 credit who owes $5,000 in federal income taxes would pay nothing to the IRS and receive a $3,000 payment from the government. If you are due to receive a $1,000 refund, you would receive $9,000 ($1,000 plus the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit).

-A repeat buyer who owes $5,000 would pay nothing to the IRS and receive $1,500 back from the government. If you are due to get a $1,000 refund, you would get $7,500 ($1,000 plus the $6,500 repeat buyer tax credit).

-All qualified homebuyers can take the tax credit on their 2009 or 2010 income tax return.

Payback Provisions
The tax credit is a true credit. It does not have to be repaid unless the home owner sells or stops using the home as their principal residence within three years after the purchase.

So remember,  This is not for the short term buyer looking to make a buck.  It will be need to be repaid, upon the sale or transfer of title, at any time during the first 3 years.

Fraud and Prevention for Dummies!

3 comments  | 

Wet Ink issue 9

Have you ever heard the term ‘a wet signature’?

Banks often want to see documents with the original signature called ‘a wet signature’  Often asked for when a notary was not required to witness the signature.    I have been using the Uniball 207 Gel Pen for over 5 years just for the slightly different color of the “ink”.  I had no idea it held a secrtet!!!!

The bank where you have a checking account..LOVES… this video.

Disappearing Ink Video

I usually go through several bubble packs a year.  You can probably get by with just a couple of these beauties!

I have no connection with the manufacturer or distributors..just wanted to give a consumer tip!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Short Sales with Countrywide B of A WaMu JPMorgan Chase

2 comments  | 

STOCKTON, CA - APRIL 29:  (FILE PHOTO)An aband...

via Getty Images


Short Sales with Countrywide B of A WaMu JPMorgan Chase are going to become more relevant in the coming year. I just got off the phone with Bof A regarding a short sale I am working to a close.  Word has it the short sale departments, at many mortgage lenders, are expanding and preparing for a bumpy 2-3 years.

UPDATE: 12/09 Changes are being implemented, on-line submission is one interesting change.

It may change the outlook in the foreclosure market as these institutions become more aware of their losses with REO’s.  It is obvious they are learning that the Short Sale option is the better answer.

This B of A employee was quite talkative and shared a few things we all need to know.  Fannie Mae (the government agency)  is causing the most trouble for everyone.   I  do not want to absolve all short sale departments from some responsibility here, yet.   Similar to trying to open a bank safe without a combo the banks have seen massive delays and required information changes coming from Fannie Mae in the form of more…..’forms’.

Have you ever been flustered by those pesky government forms?  You may be sympathetic to the bank….I am not!  I want to call a department speak to a ‘person’ and get the business done…Do you agree?

I have read tons of material from people who claim to have the golden key to helping people with short sales.  The problem is that each and every bank and each and every home/seller is different.  There is no one golden key.

Short Sale departments receive over 100000 faxes a day and most of the specialists have  well over a thousand files each.  Hire more specialists ever occur to anyone?  Each person considering a short sale option has very different financial needs, assets and goals.  Not to mention, different mortgage companies.

It is important to know where and how to make your short sale more visible with the mortgage servicer and understand how people work.  Hiring a short sale professional is strongly recommended one with experience and a temperament to fit.

Do banks lie?  Yes and No. The contact numbers are constantly changed, staff is moved around and responsibilities are adjusted all the time from the client bank (the one who hired the servicer i.e. Wells Fargo).  The client bank delegates directives to the servicer to create guidelines used to gain their short sale approval.  Changing the rules of the game.  Is that lying?

This link takes you to my FOX News Interview broadcast Video

Being prepared for these guideline changes, before they are implemented,  will reduce the anxiety in this very frustrating process.  Your chosen professional should have a strategy to employ.

When you are willing to change, bend, search, use good practices and LISTEN the ordeal will come to an acceptable close.

Find a professional to represent you, employ them and prepare for a few bumps.

Hold on turbulence are ahead as change is sometimes not easy.  I am preparing everyday for the next bump.   I have my seatbelt drawn tight.

Update 12/22/2009 New FHA lender rules for short sales

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Home Sales Up but Jobs are Down

1 comment  | 

North Santa Cruz SignIt’s a no brainer that housing and jobs are interrelated.  Fix housing and jobs will follow in service sectors and and the manufacturing of products we need at home.

I believe only one thing is going to get our  economy moving again..Housing. We got here because Real Estate based derivatives failed to produce gains. Right?  No money, no growth and no jobs.

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in September 2009, rose 6.1% to 110.1 from a reading of 103.8 in August, and is 21.2% higher than September 2008 when it stood at 90.9. The gain from a year ago is the largest annual increase on record, and the index is at the highest level since December 2006 when it was 112.8.

We got here because Real Estate based derivatives failed to produce gains.   Well, then why doesn’t the government focus more on housing strategies? Obviously, it has been very effective!

This quote proves my point…

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the momentum is understandable. “What we’re witnessing is a rush of first-time buyers trying to beat the expiration of the tax credit at the end of this month,” he said. “Home values will stabilize sooner rather than over-correcting. That, in turn, will mean wealth stabilization for the vast number of middle-class families and lay the foundation for a durable economic recovery.”

What if  the Obama administration created another tax benefit for ALL buyers?  Better yet,  produce better guidelines that all banks must use to implement procedures that fast track short sales.  Oh, Oh, Oh I know!   LOAN MODS!!!!!  What happened to all the promises there?    Fix Housing-Fix America!

Even renters could see a benefit.   Consider an apartment owner who would not feel the need to raise rents to their max if he could only get a small loan mod.   Do you think you would be a ‘consumer’ again if you could get a loan mod?   I bet your answer is ” YEP”!  That new TV or new Dining Room table would become affordable for you and that only creates more jobs! Right?

So many sectors of the economy are dependent on housing that it is a big ‘no brainer’  that housing should be the focus.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Short Sales, Helocs and the CA Default Judgement

1 comment  | 

You want the Short Sale approved by the Jr. Lien Holder?  It can be like a Birthday Party!

Invite the Jr. Lien Holder to the Birthday Party if you want the Short Sale approved.

Halloween House Cake IMG

Remember when you were a kid and went to  birthday parties and the Cake never seemed to be divided exactly even?    If you saw Johnny get a bigger piece you wanted a bigger piece.  The Jr. Lien Holder has the same reaction.

The Jr. Lien Holder knows  the HUD1 only allocates to them what the First Lien Holder is willing to serve.   All the so called ‘experts’ say they have no recourse.    This is wrong in many cases!  You must persuade them to accept what the First is offering or find alternatives.  They may want the corner piece.  Not only is this important to know and execute, there is the question of the second position.  Is it a purchase money loan or HELOC (Home Equity Line of Credit)?

If the second mortgage is a purchase money loan, loan used as purchase money at the time of the purchase, then there really is no recourse… IF you do not fall prey to their tactics.    But Wait! Is the Second mortgage a HELOC?

In the case of a HELOC their recourse is to leave open the option of  a Deficiency Judgement against you.  It is important to know the law in your State regarding DJs.  Your Realtor and Attorney will know this.

I recently found one of my clients was being led into foreclosure by the HELOC second holder.     Not only was there a so called  “Short Sale Expediting Company” involved there were 2 different lending institutions involved and the cake was not going to be divided evenly.   Birthday parties are always more fun if everyone feels they are getting their fair share of the Birthday Cake.  Actually, the SSEC was not doing anything for my new client.   They had not even tried to cut the cake.    I became involved and quickly learned the Jr. Lien Holder wanted MORE ( Really?) and was not going to settle for what the First was willing to offer.  I found that the Jr. Lien Holder would allow items to paid outside of escrow (POC).   It became obvious they only wanted to see contributions.  They were not necessarily concerned with the size of their slice of cake anymore.  The were more interested in the size of the other pieces.   Guess they didn’t like butter cream either.

Short Sales with 2 or 3 different lenders, in most cases, have a HELOC  in Santa Clara County.  How can you convince them that their piece of cake is satisfactory?    Talk with an accomplished Realtor and an Attorney if you find this is your situation.   Often, you can find a Realtor and Attorney who have a successful record of executed Short Sales and negotiated strongly with HELOC lenders.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Did you know the Debt Relief Act was extended?

Add a comment  | 

Tax image for postsThe Debt Relief act of 2007 has been revised and every Seller considering a short sale better brush up!  Tax  Software has yet to be updated and one needs to get the new form 982 from the IRS or Post Office.  Those extensions are due!!!!

From the official IRS website:

The late-December enactment means that reporting procedures for this law change were not incorporated into tax-preparation software or IRS forms. For that reason, people using tax software should check with their provider for updates that include the revised Form 982. Similarly, the IRS is now updating its systems and expects to begin accepting electronically-filed returns that include Form 982 by March 3. The paper Form 982 is now being accepted, but the IRS reminds affected taxpayers to consider filing electronically, which greatly reduces errors and speeds refunds.

The new law applies to debt forgiven in 2007, 2008 or 2009. Debt reduced through mortgage restructuring, as well as mortgage debt forgiven in connection with a foreclosure, may qualify for this relief. In most cases, eligible homeowners only need to fill out a few lines on Form 982 (specifically, lines 1e, 2 and 10b).

The debt must have been used to buy, build or substantially improve the taxpayer’s principal residence and must have been secured by that residence. Debt used to refinance qualifying debt is also eligible for the exclusion, but only up to the amount of the old mortgage principal, just before the refinancing.

Debt forgiven on second homes, rental property, business property, credit cards or car loans does not qualify for the new tax-relief provision. In some cases, however, other kinds of tax relief, based on insolvency, for example, may be available. See Form 982 for details.

Borrowers whose debt is reduced or eliminated receive a year-end statement (Form 1099-C) from their lender. For debt cancelled in 2007, the lender was required to provide this form to the borrower by Jan. 31, 2008. By law, this form must show the amount of debt forgiven and the fair market value of any property given up through foreclosure.

The IRS urges borrowers to check the Form 1099-C carefully. Notify the lender immediately if any of the information shown is incorrect. Borrowers should pay particular attention to the amount of debt forgiven (Box 2) and the value listed for their home ( Box 7).

Note: Legislation enacted in October 2008 extended this relief through 2012. Thus this relief now applies to debt forgiven in calendar years 2007 through 2012.

HVCC Appraisal Rule is not helping!

1 comment  | 

Eagan, Minnesota
Image via Wikipedia

Beware if you are selling your home or if you are an interested buyer.  This article published by the San Jose Mercury news tells a true story of a sad result of government intervention.

When David and Penny Mann decided it was time to move to a retirement community, their real estate agent told them that in this rough market, it could take months to sell their downtown San Jose Victorian. So they were thrilled to receive back-to-back offers in the first week, and they accepted the first offer of $560,000, from an enthusiastic young couple buying their first home.

“Things were sailing through,” said David Mann, a retired minister.

But just days before the sale was to close, an appraisal required by a new federal code came in $100,000 below the sale price, torpedoing the deal and sending the buyers and sellers into an emotional tailspin. It’s just one example of the turmoil this new rule-intended to prevent fraud-has caused: Appraisers say it is forcing many of them out of business while pushing up fees and derailing sales, all at a time when the real estate market can ill afford such problems.

The new rule, which took effect May 1, forbids brokers from hiring their own appraisers and requires intermediaries-called appraisal management companies-to choose them instead.

The change was intended to reduce the possibility that brokers and lenders would pressure appraisers to raise house values to match sale prices, regardless of the true value. It affects all loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The rule meant the Manns’ first appraisal, which came in at the full sales price and was conducted before the rule took effect, was invalid, and they needed a new one. The second appraiser, based in Oakland and sent by an appraisal management company, told the Manns’ agent he had never worked in San Jose. When his appraisal came in $100,000 below the offer price, the lender wouldn’t approve the buyers’ loan.

“That’s when the drama began,” Mann said. “There is something so wrong in all this,” said Georgie Huff, president of Capital Properties in downtown San Jose, who represented the Manns. “And a lot of qualified buyers and sellers are being victimized.”

No one is tracking the precise results of the new rule, but Bill Hillestad, strategic director of Think Big Work Small, which provides resources for the real estate industry and is pushing to have the rule repealed, says his research offers some clues.

In his online poll of industry professionals, about two-thirds of respondents said they had had at least one appraisal come in under the purchase price since the new rules took effect, with the average difference being more than $13,000. And 90% of respondents said they had lost at least one transaction.

Hillestad said the code has the potential to kill the country’s budding real estate recovery by depressing prices even more than the foreclosure crisis. If willing sellers and buyers agree on a price, the appraisal shouldn’t scuttle the deal, he said.

“We are exactly the kind of sale which our country needs in order to begin getting housing sales moving again,” Penny Mann wrote in a letter to the lender for the couple who wanted to buy their home. As David Mann put it, the deal he struck “was a new stake in the ground to revive this neighborhood.”

The new rule, called the Home Valuation Code of Conduct, is part of the settlement of a lawsuit filed by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who had accused Washington Mutual of pressuring appraisers to inflate home values.

Accurate appraisals are necessary to prevent fraud in home sales and to protect lenders in case a loan holder defaults and the property has to be sold. Washington Mutual, however, was accused of inflating values to make more money on higher-priced loans.

While the intent was noble, the policy has had devastating consequences for some appraisers, many of whom have signed a petition  www.hvccpetition.com) to try to repeal the rule-a cause taken up by U.S. Rep. Gary Miller, a Southern California Republican who is co-sponsoring legislation asking for an 18-month moratorium.

A Santa Cruz appraiser who used to have about 10 jobs a month says she is now lucky to get just one, as the management companies change the way work is doled out. And instead of being paid between $350 and $500, she might get just $200. The management company pockets the difference. “I’m sure there were a lot of crooked appraisals. But to put every appraiser basically out of business is not OK,” said the appraiser, who didn’t want her name used for fear that she would jeopardize future work. “After having my business for 20 years, I’m about to lose my house.”

Qing Jiang, a San Jose appraiser, said the new rule is also having a chilling effect as appraisers, “to protect themselves, to avoid being accused of pushing values up, are putting the value at the lower end. This will push the housing values down and have a huge effect.”

For traditional home sellers like the Manns-both retired clergy with the United Church of Christ-the rule nearly cost them their retirement. The couple were waiting to take a tour of their new Southern California bungalow, near their children and grandchildren, when their agent called with the news that the deal was unraveling because of the second appraisal. “We postponed the tour for an hour,” Mann said, “and went to a neighborhood park and cried.”

The intentions of the HVCC rule have hurt more than helped and already struggling San Jose Real Estate market.

The buyers were equally devastated when their loan company balked at funding their mortgage. They had spent months looking for the perfect house, walking through at least 40 and viewing hundreds more online.

The Manns’ century-old Victorian was ideal for Michael Schlemmer, a lawyer. So the young lawyer was undeterred. “I’m an educated person. I’ve lived in the Bay Area my whole life,” he said. “I had no question it was worth $560,000-plus. Neither did my agent or the mortgage broker or the first appraiser who approved it.” Nor, as it turned out, did a third appraiser. After Huff insisted the management company send someone with a 408 area code, the value came in at the sales price. Early this month, after weeks of hand-wringing, the deal closed.

This is only one of the many pitfalls in this new market that we are having to overcome.   What challenges have you experienced?

San Jose Mercury News article

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Current Market Stats for 2009

Add a comment  | 

This chart shows the market change we are experiencing. The current inventory is very low and the number of new listings coming to the market is slowing. There are only 5,575 properties listed for sale today.

chart_17

Over 2 Billion dollars of sales have been closed in the second quarter of this year compared to 1.1 Billion in the first quarter of 2009.

Days on the market ( the term in which the property was listed and sold) has been slashed in the single family home arena from 103 to 92. 104 days on the market for Condo/Townhomes in Santa Clara County continues to be the norm.

It is my opinion, based on this information that prices are not going down anytime soon. Consider this: The average sales price for single family homes was at $567,338 in the first quarter and it is now, $641,208 a positive change of $73,870 in just three months.

That is an increase of over 10%. The Median Sale Price increased by $55,000! I have all the information required to help you make an offer that you can live with.  No,  There is no obligation.   We all need to work as a team today!

Are you in the “prices are going to drop camp”? Maybe you should start looking for a new campsite.

Now, I know all Real Estate is local.   Areas like Los Gatos and Cupertino are seeing a serious difference in activity compared to Milpitas and Sunnyvale.

First Time Buyer Credit Myth?

Add a comment  | 

small-home-in-hands-img-for-postsBringing the Dream of Homeownership Within Reach

I have waited to post this info since, the last time the program was announced it was removed and now, finally, we can rely on it’s use.   I have added a link below, from the housing dept., to clarify the details for you and everyone in our Santa Clara County community of interested buyers and investors.

Congress has passed the legislation that grants a tax credit of up to $8,000 to first-time home buyers.

Here is more information about how the 2009 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit can help prospective home buyers become part of the American dream.

Who Qualifies?

First-time home buyers who purchase homes between January 1, 2009 and December 1, 2009.

To qualify as a “first-time home buyer” the purchaser or his/her spouse may not have owned a residence during the three years prior to the purchase.

Which Properties Are Eligible?

The 2009 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit may be applied to primary residences, including: single-family homes, condos, townhomes, and co-ops.

How Much Will the Credit Be?

The maximum allowable credit for home buyers is $8,000. Each home buyer’s tax credit is determined by two factors:

The price of the home-the credit is equal to 10% of the purchase price of the home, up to $8,000.    In our San Jose market this is a no brainer…the whole $8000 credit can be used if you meet the income restrictions.

The buyer’s income-single buyers with incomes up to $75,000 and married couples with incomes up to $150,000-may receive the maximum tax credit.

How to use the credit

If the Buyer(s)’ Income Exceeds These Limits, Can He/She Still Get a Credit?

Yes, some buyers may still be eligible for the credit.

The credit decreases for buyers who earn between $75,000 and $95,000 for single buyers and between $150,000 and $170,000 for home buyers filing jointly. The amount of the tax credit decreases as his/her income approaches the maximum limit. Home buyers earning more than the maximum qualifying income-over $95,000 for singles and over $170,000 for couples are not eligible for the credit.

Will the Tax Credit Need to Be Repaid?

No. The buyer does not need to repay the tax credit, if he/she occupies the home for three years or more. However, if the property is sold during the three-year period, the credit will be recouped on the sale.